At the Gartner Data and Analytics Summit in March 2026, the conversation kept returning to the same problem: organizations have built serious streaming infrastructure, but they still can’t get authoritative decisions out of it fast enough to matter. Kafka clusters are humming. Data is moving. The agents still aren’t working in production.
Stratola Chief Analyst Dinesh Chandrasekhar was there. His takeaway: the agentic AI production data gap is now the defining infrastructure challenge for enterprise AI, and most teams are looking for the answer in the wrong places.
Why agentic AI stalls between pilot and production
In Chandrasekhar’s report, Why AI Fails Without Decision Products, he draws on Deloitte research showing that only 11% of enterprises have agentic AI actively running in production today, with another 38% stuck in pilot. His diagnosis: the chief obstacle is the inability of traditional data pipelines to support the real-time, stateful, transactionally consistent data access that autonomous agents require.
Chandrasekhar frames this as a failure of data immediacy: most stacks can capture real-time data, but can’t make it available at the moment a decision actually needs to be made. Agents reasoning from stale batch data hallucinate. Agents without transactionally consistent state produce recommendations that can’t be safely acted on.
The gap isn’t in the data. It’s in the last mile to action.
The architectural reason is structural. A typical real-time stack requires five or more system integrations to produce a single decision: a streaming broker, a stream processing engine, a state store, a serving layer, and an application gateway. Each hop adds latency. Each boundary introduces failure modes. The result is a system that moves data at millisecond speed but produces decisions at second-scale latency.
For fraud prevention, that gap means the transaction has already cleared.
For usage enforcement, it means the overage has already happened.
For agentic AI, it means the agent is reasoning from a version of the world that no longer exists.
The report introduces a category of real-time data products specifically designed to close this gap: purpose-built for operational execution, not analytical insight, and operating at sub-10 millisecond latency with full ACID compliance. The report maps out where this category sits in the broader data product maturity model, why the mainstream data platform market has largely left it unaddressed, and what it takes to build one.
Volt closes the gap streaming can’t
Volt Active Data is featured in the report as the platform purpose-built for Decision Products. Agentic AI requires a decisioning layer, not just faster pipelines. Volt collapses the five-layer real-time stack into a single in-memory architecture that delivers sub-10 millisecond, ACID-compliant decisions.
Streaming platforms solve the signal problem. Volt solves the decision problem. The two are not the same thing, and conflating them is precisely why so many agentic AI initiatives are still stuck in pilot.
The Bottom Line
The agentic AI production data gap is not going to close by improving the models. It closes when organizations build the data infrastructure that agents actually require: real-time, governed, transactionally consistent, and capable of returning authoritative decisions rather than analytical approximations.
Chandrasekhar’s report makes the case with hard numbers, a clear framework for where the market stands, and a direct argument for what needs to change. It is worth reading in full.
Read the full Stratola analyst report: Why AI Fails Without Decision Products

Analyst Report
Why AI Fails Without Decision Products
89% of enterprises are still running pilots. See what the other 11% built differently.




